Skip to content

It Is What It Is. Sherlock: “The Lying Detective”

36
Share

It Is What It Is. Sherlock: “The Lying Detective”

Home / It Is What It Is. Sherlock: “The Lying Detective”
Featured Essays Sherlock

It Is What It Is. Sherlock: “The Lying Detective”

By

Published on January 9, 2017

36
Share
Sherlock, The Lying Detective, season 4

Sherlock has reached the midpoint of its current season, and slammed us with a massive reveal. Let’s get nitty-gritty with the “The Lying Detective.”

Spoilers for Sherlock 4×02 “The Lying Detective.”

 

Summary

Culverton Smith, a wealthy philanthropist, gathers his close friends and his daughter Faith together and administers a drug to the group to help them forget the secret he needs to get off his chest. He tells them that he needs to kill someone. Faith tries to write down what she remembers of the conversation, but he stops her and tells her to hand over the sheet of paper with what she’s written. John is in therapy with a new person who is encouraging him to accept his difficulties in the grieving process, but John isn’t having it. He also refuses to admit that he’s been hallucinating Mary all over the place, and speaking to her. An Aston Martin pulls up at his therapist’s door; it’s Mrs. Hudson, here to tell him that Sherlock has been off his head on cocaine all this time and that he needs to help him.

Sherlock has spent the past weeks in a fugue of drugs and deduction. At one point, Faith Smith came to see him and talk about the notes she wrote after being witness to her father’s confession. She told Sherlock that the one word she couldn’t remember—who her father wanted to kill—has haunted her to this day. He realized that she was suicidal and took her out for chips, getting rid of the gun in her bag as payment for taking her case. She told him that she hadn’t expected him to be nice, and then the drugs knocked Sherlock out for a spell before he woke up to find her vanished. He then deduced that the word that had haunted her was “anyone”: Culverton Smith is a serial killer, and Sherlock publicly accused him on Twitter and his blog.

Back in the present, Mrs. Hudson reveals that she drove Sherlock to John in the boot of her car. It turns out that Sherlock already knew this would happen, and arranged to have everyone meet John here at his therapist’s place, knowing which therapist John would pick, and that fact that he would want Molly to confirm his drug use, and that Culverton Smith would ask to see him that day and send a car to pick them up. Molly confirms that if Sherlock keeps using at this rate, he’ll die in weeks, then the two head out to meet Smith. The man is odious and suspicious to fault, then takes the two to the wing of a local hospital that he built and show them his favorite room: the mortuary. Sherlock had called Faith to the scene, seeming to think that her presence would cow her father, but when she arrives, she is not the woman who came to Sherlock’s flat at all. Sherlock has a breakdown over this, and pulls a scalpel on Smith, leaving John to subdue him. But John gets carried away and beats Sherlock in anger for what happened to Mary. Smith attempts to stop him, but Sherlock says John has a right.

Sherlock, The Lying Detective, season 4

Sherlock is being kept at the hospital, and Smith visits him through a secret passage—he had them built into “his” wing of the building, just like the infamous H. H. Holmes house, so that he could visit patients and satisfy his desire to kill. He asks why Sherlock did this, and Sherlock admits that he wanted Smith to confess the murders to him, even if it killed him. Back at Baker Street, John and Mrs. Hudson find Mycroft and his goons combing over the place. Mycroft is adamant that this behavior from Sherlock doesn’t make sense given his rational approach. Mrs. Hudson laughs at him, telling Mycroft that Sherlock reacts to things emotionally, which leads them to discover Mary’s video message. Mrs. Hudson kicks everyone out but John, and they watch the video in its entirety. Mary gave Sherlock instructions to save John, telling him that he would have to let John save him for it to work. She advised him to pick a fight with a big villain, which is precisely what Sherlock has done. John rushes to the hospital in time to save Sherlock’s life.

John is spending time with Sherlock on rotation with other friends to be certain that he won’t use again. It comes to light that it’s Sherlock’s birthday when John hears Irene Adler’s text message alert, and realizes that she’s still alive. He advises Sherlock to find her and actually attempt a relationship because there was no telling how much time anyone had. He tells Sherlock that Mary’s death wasn’t his fault, then admits to having an affair with a woman he met on the bus… but only via text messages. He apologizes to the figment of Mary in his head and has a breakdown. Sherlock gets to his feet and draws John into a hug. Later, John goes back to his therapist and notices that something’s amiss. It turns out that his therapist is the woman who pretended to be Faith to Sherlock. She’s also the woman that John was having his affair with. She reveals herself to be Eurus Holmes—named for the east wind—Sherlock and Mycroft’s sister. Then she pulls a gun on John and pulls the trigger.

 

Commentary

I wanna be all like Darth Vader right now: “Sister! So… you have a twin sister!”

Sherlock, The Lying Detective, season 4

Fine, we have no idea if she’s Sherlock’s twin, but a) that’s usually a thing in these sorts of surprise hidden sibling stories, and b) Sherlock said to John in “The Six Thatchers” that “it’s never twins.” Often in this show, little throwaway lines from other cases come back like that, so… someone is probably a twin. Maybe it’s Eurus and Sherlock, maybe it’s Mycroft and Sherrinford, but someone. Probably.

Oh right, I should also mention that I’m assuming that Sherrinford and Eurus are two different people and that there are actually four Holmes siblings now. Euros could be Sherrinford, but that seems unlikely, since she lists all three names to John after her own, saying that her parents picked odd ones. Their poor parents. How did they ever survive with so many weird genius babies?

There are a lot of great things in this episode in terms of character work. John is working through his grief in a detailed and painful manner, and Sherlock continues to believe that he functions at max capacity or better when he’s high as an airplane, despite all evidence to the absolute contrary. Watching the story bring the two back together is beautifully done and heartbreaking, to boot. Amanda Abbington is clearly having a blast playing the Mary in John’s head, and she does an incredible job of making the figment eerie and funny and commanding all at once. (Not super pleased with the device, since having her there in John’s head is a really fun thing to play, but still ultimately a way for Mary to be there without being a complete person.)

One theme that we’ve been seeing more and more of since the third season is a real close look at Sherlock’s life as a drug addict, something that was ghosted over in the beginning. Sherlock deserves credit for not shying away from this aspect of the character, and does a good job of refusing to glamorize his state while still keeping the canon conceit that Sherlock uses drugs to help himself solve cases. The reappearance of Bill Wiggins adds further credence to this, making it clear that Sherlock has a different sphere of people he engages with while he’s in that headspace, and that they take up real room in his life. The only question is whether or not this will be central to the upcoming finale, and whether or not the show is attempting to address his state in a meaningful way.

The episode is also supremely clever in using the machinations of the performance world against us. It is fairly hard to tell that fake “Faith,” John’s therapist, and the woman he was having an affair with are all the same person for two reasons—she’s well made-up in each incarnation, and we get so accustomed to seeing similar actors in TV and film and we often don’t question people looking incredibly similar. Unless you’ve got great knack for faces, it’s likely that you didn’t notice these three women were the same until the very end. A very nice way of handling something that could have easily given away the game too quickly.

Sherlock, The Lying Detective, season 4

On the one hand, it’s nice that John didn’t have an actual physical relationship when he chose to have an affair. (And I also appreciate that he considers it to be cheating even without sex, because he’s an adult and understands that emotional cheating is a thing.) On the other hand, it seems like the choice to handle it this way was out of a desire to make this another “gotcha!” moment in the series. They tease the audience by making it seem like John was having a full-fledged affair, then rein it in by saying “oh, but it was just texting” so the audience had a week to be aggravated with the character before realizing that it maybe wasn’t as bad as they thought. Which is manipulative in an annoying way rather than a clever one. Also, it smacks of “oh right, we can’t let John sleep with Sherlock’s sister, so we have to mess around with this a bit to make it work.” (I’m not going to get into the whole guy-has-best-friend-and-everyone-thinks-they’re-gay-then-guy-has-crush-on-bffs-sister-what-nothing-it’s-different trope/subtext because at this point, with this show, the whole thing just seems like overkill. John and Sherlock love each other, the end.)

I think I’ve struck on the thing that’s currently bothering me about this season plot-wise. In the previous seasons, each episode had two sides: the reimagined canon Holmes story and the arc-centered story. And these typically wove together so well because an average episode of Sherlock contained just enough to keep the season arc chugging along while making smart choices in reconstituting an old Holmes tale. But this season we’ve had one reimagining that simply used the old story’s plot as a red herring (“The Six Thatchers”), and now this episode basically replicated the plot of “The Dying Detective” without any truly significant restructuring at all. If you’d read the story, you’d know exactly how the plot with Culverton Smith was going to unfold—the only difference were the extra bits added to play into the season arc.

Unfortunately, this weakness of plot takes away one of the main things that has made Sherlock such a fascinating show: its ability to upgrade Holmes canon with fun, modern twists. Instead, Culverton Smith tries to kill Sherlock so that Sherlock can prove he’s killer, just as the original Doyle story had it… and we get a weird needless aside about H. H. Holmes’s murder house to explain the hospital’s ins and outs. It’s a bit of a letdown in a show that is usually very good about grinding up its source material until it resembles a new dish.

This ending offers up a playground of potential theories, all of which are more wacky than the last. So let’s look at what we (think we) know:

  • Eurus means “eastern wind,” which was a phrase in an important story to Sherlock last season
  • There are at least three Holmes siblings, now possibly four
  • Sherlock is still having that recurring dream with Redbeard and another person
  • Mycroft has been meaning to talk to Sherrinford
  • Eurus has to be tied to the Moriarty plotline somehow due to giving Sherlock the note that said “Miss Me?”

Clearly something happened in Sherlock’s youth tied to Eurus. My assumption is that his recurring dream is a repressed memory. The question is, of what? His sister’s death (that turns out to be faked)? Something terrible that his sister and/or Mycroft did in their youth? Something horrible that he did as a child? The fact that he even had a sister at all? If it seemed to Sherlock as though she died in a traumatic way, perhaps Sherlock blocked the memory of her entirely. Unlikely, but anything is possible in this context.

If Sherlock does remember her, then it’s likely that he either thinks she’s dead or they’re estranged, explaining why he didn’t recognize her. There’s a clear kinship between them, though—he likes her as Faith Smith and her comment that he is “nice” seems to be true to her opinion, rather than the persona of Faith. Another question; did she simply seed the detail that Faith was suicidal to make Sherlock want to help her? Or was Eurus herself actually suicidal?

Here’s my number one concern: I really really really really really do not want Eurus to be somehow “behind” the whole Moriarty arc. I don’t want her to be Moriarty, or to be the guiding hand behind Moriarty. I also don’t want that to be the case with Mycroft in any capacity (though plots like that have been explored in Holmes pastiches and so forth). It cheapens the character of Moriarty entirely. In addition, there’s something extra annoying about revealing a hidden Holmes sister and having her be automatically evil. (Sherrinford could potentially be a woman and assuage that problem, of course.) It’s also the exact same ploy that occurred when John and Sherlock first met, and he mistook Harry to be a brother rather than a sister. So we’ll see where that ends up.

There is one possibility that intrigues me, even if I don’t like the idea of cutting into Moriarty’s legacy: the idea that Mycroft and/or Eurus were concerned about Sherlock’s descent into drug addiction, and invented Moriarty as a way to occupy him and save his life. That would make the trick seem a little less stagey and over-the-top, and would also play into the concern we’re seeing over Sherlock’s cocaine/meth/whatever else use. It would make emotional sense, even if it still retconned a hefty portion of the show. Undermining Moriarty as he is now is likely to come off cheap no matter how you cut it, but that might take out the sting.

There’s also the possibility that none of this has anything to do without Moriarty, and the use of his likeness was just there to drag Sherlock home. So it’s really all up for grabs at this point.

And then there was this clever thought on Twitter (grab all the first letters):

Sherlock, The Lying Detective, season 4, twitter theory

 

Shoutouts and Unsolved Sundry

  • If Molly is just here to take care of babies and diagnose Sherlock’s cocaine usage, I would rather they didn’t write her in at all. No, that’s not true, I’d rather they let Molly do something else, because she’s wonderful and has proved that she’s worth more than this.
  • I also miss having Lestrade around in a meaningful capacity. Come back to me, Greg. I long for your incredulousness.
  • Irene and Sherlock having this adorable text-sometimes relationship is a really great button on that dynamic. (Is she still teasing him about his funny hat? Are they still making dinner plans?) Also, it was a clever way of wishing Sherlock a happy birthday on his near-birthday—it’s generally thought to be January 6th.

Sherlock, The Lying Detective, season 4

  • We get more Bond references, with Mrs. Hudson owning and driving his favorite car (on film, at least), an Aston Martin. And driving it like a maniac with Sherlock in the trunk. That was maybe the greatest moment in the show’s entirety to date. Add to that, they use that moment to explain that OBVIOUSLY Mrs. Hudson is rich if she’s able to own that building in central London and keep a tenant like Sherlock who clearly doesn’t overstress about his rent. Mrs. Hudson for the win, forever.
  • Mycroft and Lady Smallwood! Yeah, that was pretty much exactly how I thought Mycroft preferred his dalliances; with boss ladies, in his office. I feel like she’s enough of a match for him that I want this to continue….

Emmet Asher-Perrin wants to drive around with Mrs. Hudson for a day, at any speed. You can bug her on Twitter and Tumblr, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.

About the Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin

Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin is the News & Entertainment Editor of Reactor. Their words can also be perused in tomes like Queers Dig Time Lords, Lost Transmissions: The Secret History of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and Uneven Futures: Strategies for Community Survival from Speculative Fiction. They cannot ride a bike or bend their wrists. You can find them on Bluesky and other social media platforms where they are mostly quiet because they'd rather talk to you face-to-face.
Learn More About Emmet
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ChristopherLBennett
8 years ago

I almost missed the first half-hour of this one, because all the TV listings said it was on at 9:30, but when I switched channels to PBS after The Librarians (just so it’d be on the right station in half an hour), I saw the opening donor credits to Masterpiece Mystery instead of the last half-hour of the rerun of last week’s episode as scheduled. So I stuck around to see what was going on, and it was the new episode half an hour early. I got lucky there.

I wasn’t even sure I wanted to keep watching after last week, but this one was better. Still crazy and excessive and overindulgent, but the characters came off better in the end, and there was some interesting plotting and other stuff. I was certainly glad to hear Watson drop the “You killed my wife” nonsense and acknowledge that Mary was her own person who made her own choices, which is what she deserved. And Mrs. Hudson is kind of awesome.

Hmm… I guess Sherlock predicting 2 weeks in advance what therapist John would go to is foreshadowing of a sort, since it explains how Euros could’ve used a parallel deductive process to arrive at the same conclusion and take over that therapist’s identity.

Wasn’t there something before about “Moriarty” just being an actor working for someone higher up? Or was that just a red-herring story he concocted? Anyway, it could be true that Euros was behind him all along. Which would be a sort of funhouse-mirror reflection of how Elementary handled Moriarty.

Avatar
Xena Catolica
8 years ago

Molly…I completely agree that her character deserves better. And I hope I wasn’t the only one who squirmed a bit at having her examine Sherlock, even if she didn’t do much more than look at his eyes, blood pressure (whatever, drug-related).  Just awkward.

SUPER creepy bad guy this week.

 

Avatar
8 years ago

A question I have, trying to remember the details about the use of the name, is whether Sherrinford is definitely a person. I recall Mycroft noting at various points to “call Sherrinford,” a phrasal construct that could easily mean a place rather than a person – something we overlook with all the talk of a third Holmes sibling. Could Sherrinford be where he expects Euros to be or somewhere in regards to the Moriarty mystery?

BTW, one clever thing I realize after the fact is that (when John asks about Adler), it’s revealed that Sherlock and Irene are just texting. It’s a cute reversal of how Watson didn’t go further with his affair while suggesting to Sherlock that he should go further.

 

@2 – the use of Molly actually struck me as appropriate (although I agree that I’d like to see more of her in her own context), for the same sort of reversal that I saw in the Sherlock/Irene situation. It was noted that John specifically would seek out a female therapist instead of a male one, given (truthfully) the way that men respond to conversations with male/female medical personnel. It’s the same thing in terms of someone like Sherlock being open enough to talk medicine with a man like John (if male doctors are seen as lecturing, even toward other men, then that’s a curious inversion of their relationship) versus a woman like Molly (as we see with Mrs. Hudson vs. someone like Mycroft, even Sherlock reacts differently to women lecturing about him than men doing so). Plus, using Molly as the second opinion means not needing to introduce another character AND her skillset allows for more alive/dead comments (as we see a morgue play a key role soon enough).

Avatar
8 years ago

HH Holmes built a hotel, not a home.  Visitors to the World’s Fair were his victims.  The story is not for the weak stomached.

Okay, here’s what’s going on.  Moffat is revealing Sherlock’s emotional backstory.  Why he is what he is.

That backstory is that the sister is a psychopath who terrorized her brothers and shut them both down emotionally.  From the clues given so far, I’m guessing that she murdered Sherlock’s Irish setter in front of him when he was little which is what shut him down emotionally.  She was then put into a mental institution, perhaps named Sherrinford, and has escaped to terrorize Sherlock once again.  He has obviously not visited this monster so he has no reason to recognize her.  

It’s not a coincidence that she put the case of a serial killer/psychopath in front of Sherlock, and it’s obvious from his sheer revulsion of such pure evil that this affects him emotionally and brings back his memories of the death of Red Beard, his dog, who was murdered. 

Cumberbatch has said that this would be a good finale for the series, and I’m guessing he’s referring to Sherlock’s facing his past in the form of his sister and moving on into a healthier combination of intellect and emotion.  

Lady Ann may be Mycroft’s redemption or the beginning of it.  

 

Avatar
Robert "Anaerin" Johnston
8 years ago

My thinking was/is that “Sherrinford” is the name of a place (“Ford” being a very typical suffix for a place, in this case a place where originally people crossed the river Sherrin), quite likely the place where “The other one” (Holmes Sibling) was being kept.

I was also thinking it was quite possible that Eurus WAS Sherlock and Mycroft’s brother, and she has transitioned since they knew her (Possibly at a facility in the aforementioned Sherrinford), which would be a nice modern twist, very much in keeping with Gatiss’ delight in weaponising people’s sexuality (See also: Torchwood, Irene Adler etc.), and a very good reason why Sherlock didn’t recognise her.

Avatar
Micael Gustavsson
8 years ago

But in the hospital bed Holmes complains that people always stop at three, so the have to be four. And twins.

Avatar
Wilson Goodson
8 years ago

Mycroft does seem to still hope that Watson can make Holmes both a good and great man. wa

And Watson is starting to perhaps unconsciously understand Holmes ability to predict his behavior.

“Why a Turkish bath”

“Yes it is a foolish way to settle disputes.”

Avatar
Craverguy
8 years ago

Apparently, a lot of British viewers see Culverton Smith as a thinly veiled version of Jimmy Savile.

Avatar
Del
8 years ago

The media have picked up on the Savile vibe, but another element in the character was, I think, Harold Shipman. 

 

Avatar
John Elliott
8 years ago

the canon conceit that Sherlock uses drugs to help himself solve cases

In the Canon, Holmes took cocaine or morphine when he didn’t have a case to keep him occupied, IIRC. 

 

wiredog
8 years ago

“concerned about Sherlock’s descent into drug addiction, and invented Moriarty as a way to occupy him”

Damn.  Which (non-canon) Holmes story had that as a plot point?  Holmes-Dracula file?  One of the movies in the past couple of decades?  Or is that such an obvious idea that lots of people used it?   

Avatar
El Rubino
8 years ago

@10 Exactly. Drugs were his refuge when he was bored.

Avatar
El Rubinow
8 years ago

@11: you may well be thinking of Nicholas Meyer’s “The Seven Percent Solution”.

Avatar
@drcox
8 years ago

At first I thought Sherrinford was a person, but it could be a place/organization. With the Moffat/Gatiss team, we just never know ’til we know :). Or do we? lol.

 

Avatar
MrBigBillyB
8 years ago

So one other thing that I haven’t seen pointed out (or have missed it if it was) is the red letters in the credits. They spell out SIX NAPOLEONS ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH in this episode.  Not sure if they are subtly giving us any additional clues, or if it’s just referencing the episodes so far.  Anyone else have insights on this?

Avatar
PG
8 years ago

Great piece, really helped me think through all that happened in the episode. One small quibble with this point about John’s affair:

“On the other hand, it seems like the choice to handle it this way was out of a desire to make this another “gotcha!” moment in the series. They tease the audience by making it seem like John was having a full-fledged affair, then rein it in by saying “oh, but it was just texting” so the audience had a week to be aggravated with the character before realizing that it maybe wasn’t as bad as they thought. Which is manipulative in an annoying way rather than a clever one.”

 

I think the previous episode in fact left the nature of Watson’s affair perfectly ambiguous. We may be trained as a modern audience to assume that such a pair is of course sleeping together off screen, but textually, there’s really no such evidence. I spent my week with more uncertainty than aggravation about John. Am I the only one? It was manipulative in an authentic way–ambiguously, as violations of fidelity may often feel.

Avatar
Del
8 years ago

Napoleon was also given as an example of a one word name. “The game’s afoot” is a commonly understood hunting phrase, but anyone using it, as Holmes famously does, is certainly knowingly quoting Shakespeare, and “Once more unto the breach” is the monologue where it appears. I expect it’s just Moffat jerking people around, and will have no meaning in the end. 

Avatar
8 years ago

Please, oh please, someone tell me how the folded paper written by Faith after her father’s drugged meeting made it into the hands of Faith – the suicidal visitor that got to have chips with Sherlock.  

ChristopherLBennett
8 years ago

@18/Tfmerritt: It didn’t seem like the real Faith was the sort of person who would even have written that paper or been troubled by the memories. Euros might’ve faked it based on her deduction of what Smith was up to. Or maybe Faith did write the note and forgot about it, and Euros found it when investigating her to set up her impersonation. This show uses Holmesian genius as a superpower, so it can pretty much justify anything.

Tessuna
8 years ago

@18 and @19, I actually think that the note was real, and everything about Faith’s life, and Euros – posing as her therapist or something – got all the info (or some info, and deduced the rest), but since Faith herself didn’t have the courage to do something about it, Euros posed as her and presented Sherlock with all evidence he needed. It seemed almost obvious to me, now I wonder why, there are certainly other explanations.

Also, I have the strangest feeling that Euros and Sherrinford might be one and the same person, and I haven’t the faintest idea where that came from, if it is some fan theory I read somewhere or some more official rumour. Anyway, some time ago I glimpsed a book that was sort of Sherlock’s “biography” – not sure how much it was based on canon – where I saw the name Sherrinford for the first time. He’s supposed to be the oldest of three brothers (no mention of a sister).

Avatar
8 years ago

From the syringes in the tea cup and Mrs Hudson calling him a smackhead the implication is he’s on heroin (smack is British for heroin).

I was assuming that Euros had been hired by Smith (via the ‘mutual acquaintance’ she mentions. Moriarty?) to put Sherlock onto him, and he had either given her the note, or given her enough information to fake one. The plan being that when Sherlock met the real Faith he would be discredited, ie ‘the boy who cried wolf’, so he would never be trusted when he accused Smith of murder.

Avatar
@drcox
8 years ago

Having watched “The Hollow Crown:  Henry VI,” which was actually darker than this “Sherlock” eppy, it was fun to hear the recitation from Henry “V.”.

Avatar
8 years ago

@21 – At the end of “The Abominable Bride” Mycroft asks Sherlock “Heroin or cocaine?” and says that Sherlock promised always, when using drugs, to leave a list of what drugs he had taken, should he overdose and need to be treated.  

So we know what Sherlock’s drugs of choice have been.  And while he doesn’t seem to be leaving a list, he does keep Billy Wiggins with him, who is known to watch over drug users for that reason.

Avatar
Del
8 years ago

Did the American presentation not show the cold open where Smith drugs his friends, Faith writes the note, and Smith takes it away from her? That’s the puzzle for those of us who see that scene, and it’s resolved when Eurus says she is acquainted with Smith and got it from him. Faith did write the note, but she never “had” it and doesn’t remember a thing about it. 

Avatar
8 years ago

I was assuming that Euros had been hired by Smith (via the ‘mutual acquaintance’ she mentions. Moriarty?) to put Sherlock onto him, and he had either given her the note, or given her enough information to fake one. The plan being that when Sherlock met the real Faith he would be discredited, ie ‘the boy who cried wolf’, so he would never be trusted when he accused Smith of murder.

I think you’re correct up to the purpose of the plan — the plan was to kill Sherlock. But yours is plausible as well — he might not have known that Sherlock was on a bender and would wind up in his hospital and a suitable target, which would be a juicy bonus. Otherwise, the plan was to get the “cereal killer” publicity and then the discreditation, and the power that one gets from beating a genius.

And he definitely gave her the real note. She said she ‘added to it’, not that she ‘recreated it’. Trying to get a fake past Sherlock is just folly anyway, even if you are dealing with another Holmes doing the fakery.

Avatar
8 years ago

So one other thing that I haven’t seen pointed out (or have missed it if it was) is the red letters in the credits. They spell out SIX NAPOLEONS ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH in this episode.  Not sure if they are subtly giving us any additional clues, or if it’s just referencing the episodes so far.  Anyone else have insights on this?

 

The Six Napoleons was the original Conan Doyle story that Six Thatchers was based on.  I suspect that’s all there is to it.

Did the American presentation not show the cold open where Smith drugs his friends, Faith writes the note, and Smith takes it away from her? That’s the puzzle for those of us who see that scene, and it’s resolved when Eurus says she is acquainted with Smith and got it from him. Faith did write the note, but she never “had” it and doesn’t remember a thing about it. 

Exactly. This was very clear. She wrote the note just after the meeting, trying desperately to remember. But in the end, he found her, took the note from her, and she forgot. It never bothered her again, she believed to the end that her dad was a Good Guy. Meanwhile, he kept the note, then handed it to Eurus to set a trap for Sherlock. Ultimate goals for this plot are still a bit ambiguous, why did Eurus want to do this? That’s undoubtedly what the 3rd episode will be about.

Avatar
8 years ago

I thought this show was too tricky by half; a bit too impressed with its own cleverness, and all its camera and storytelling gimmicks.  Not that it didn’t have good moments, especially at the end, which was quite moving.  And I had to wonder, was it a coincidence that Eurus threw such an enticing trap at Sherlock, just as he was urged by Mary’s gift to find a case that could draw Watson out of his funk?  Or are there even more layers of manipulation?

This was not the first time Toby Jones played a creepy bad guy for Steven Moffat; on the Doctor Who show he was the mysterious “Dream Lord” in Episode 7 of Series 5, “Amy’s Choice.”

Avatar
8 years ago

Perhaps I’m in a different psychological place this year (can’t think why that would be) but I don’t remember being caught up in any past episode of Sherlock the way I have been in these two, so whatever trickery is going on would appear to be working for me.

Avatar
8 years ago

And I had to wonder, was it a coincidence that Eurus threw such an enticing trap at Sherlock, just as he was urged by Mary’s gift to find a case that could draw Watson out of his funk?  Or are there even more layers of manipulation?

I have a pet theory that I’ve been nursing at another forum, which is that Mary is actually behind all this. She set up the instructions for him to find a foe and egg him on, gave him reason for doing it, and then had the foe set up pat and ready-made. She could even be the “mutual friend” Eurus refers to. This theory can work whether Mary actually died (she knew her time was up, stopped running from Death as the parable says, and set events in motion beforehand) or if she faked it. This could mean that Mary was still “bad” and wanted Sherlock dead after all… or it could mean that she was being manipulated by a bigger bad and had to sacrifice Sherlock in order to save John… who knows. It’s a pet theory and there’s a lot of interesting evidence that I can use to support it (eg the use of “Miss Me”, her planting the idea of “the secretary knows everything” in the first episode, stuff like that) but that’s all it is right now. :)

 

Tessuna
8 years ago

In these few days I talked with some friends who saw this ep, and everyone was talking about how awesome Mrs Hudson was. Like if it was the only thing worth mentioning. So I need to point out – did anyone even notice how awesome Sherlock was? He really went to hell just to save John. It was kind of amazing. Now Mrs Hudson gets all the glory just because she has a cool car.

Avatar
8 years ago

Mrs Hudson also got the drop on Sherlock. As amazing as he truly is, she got him into the trunk of a car.

Although, of course, it’s entirely possible that this was all part of his plan lol…

dwcole
8 years ago

wait wait the idea of “affairs in the heart” from Jimmy Carter is now a real thing?  Good grief – wow do I not connect with later generations even though I am only 38.  Sigh.  The idea that because I am married I can’t look/lust after another woman without consummating it in any way is really asking to much.  You are married not dead.  I would not expect my wife not to look at Kevin Sorbo and go – man that is one good looking man I wouldn’t mind boning.  

A married person should also be able to have friends even close friends of the opposite sex that are not his wife without that being an issue.  I mean I can see that Watson crossed the line here perhaps but honestly I would need to see the texts to say that. 

I also don’t share the annoyance of the reveal of it being just texting – I was hoping this episode would have recovered the other episode for our recapper.  I am sad to see it did not.  I thought it set up this episode very well and both were great. 

Likely helps though I own the complete Doyle Sherlock Holmes I don’t remember the stories she mentioned.  Will have to look them up and read them again.  The six thatchers seemed more like a reference to a case in Sherlock Holmes consulting detective to me.

Avatar
8 years ago

@32 – Jimmy Carter did not talk about “affairs of the heart” he talked about “lust in the heart,” to merely look at another person with lust.  That is different from what happened here. 

The problem with John’s actions is not that he felt a moment’s lust when seeing a pretty woman. It’s what he did with it.  He established a covert relationship, and he led on the other woman that it might become more, while seeking an emotional connection that competed with his one with Mary. 

If he’d merely looked, appreciated, and then moved on with his day, no one here would have a problem. If he’d developed an appropriate platonic friendship, without keeping secrets from Mary, no one would have a problem.  After all, no one has a problem with Marry’s close friendship with Sherlock, or John’s friendships with Molly or Mrs. Hudson.  Presumably the both also have many other friends, as there was quite a crowd at their wedding.

It’s the secrets, and the emotional competition with the relationship with the spouse, that is the problem.  

Carter was saying that the natural inclination to appreciate physical attractiveness in others is a problem.  That is not what the problem is here.  The problem is setting up a relationship in competition with the spouse.

Avatar
The Prince of Magpies
8 years ago

A quick note about Sherlock’s birthday. This episode actually seems to imply it’s somewhere in mid July. The majority of the episode takes place over the course of a day, or a little more, explicitly set three weeks after the opening scenes with Sherlock and ‘Faith.’ During their walk around London they pass a screen displaying part of the score of a football match. We can see the Irish tricolour represented in a ball shape (as all the competing nations in Euro 2016 were displayed) and the number 1. This implies their walk took place on June 22nd, the night Ireland beat Italy 1-0. (Although my conclusion is based on the assumption that it was displaying the score of a match going on at that moment, the Italy match was the only one Ireland played at night, rather than the score of a match played earlier that day). 

Avatar
Del
8 years ago

I wouldn’t overthink visual details in Moffat and Gatiss’ production. For instance, in this episode and the next, John steps off a northbound bus on his way home, at what is the 159 bus stop opposite St George’s Catholic Cathedral and North Lambeth tube station (visible in the distance).  So he and Mary have a flat south of the river, and he works in a practice further south than that? Maybe, but the bus is marked 626, a route that belongs in Finchley, miles away in north London. What’s the Holmesian explanation, what message are we being sent here? 

Likely none, just the Doylist explanation that the continuity staff didn’t think it through when they were hiring the bus for filming, and failed to change the number. The trouble is that film and television producers aren’t as super smart as Holmes, and aren’t as lucky as Doyle to be able to sketch a few details in text and let you fill in the rest with your imagination. Live location filming produces more visual detail than they can anticipate. 

Avatar
Del
8 years ago

John steps off a northbound bus on his way home

No, that’s wrong isn’t it? He won’t have spent a working day with a flower in his hair without someone commenting. Obviously he’s on his way to work, so strike “a flat south of the river, and he works in a practice further south” and reverse it. South London does match Mary Morstan’s home in the books. The bus route’s still wrong though.